Coronoid Fragment Size in Monteggia Fractures Predicts Ultimate Function.

We sought to determine what effect the size of a displaced coronoid fracture fragment in Monteggia injuries has on clinical outcome. Sixty-seven patients presented to an academic medical center for operative fixation of a Monteggia fracture. Radiographs were assessed for length and height of the displaced coronoid fragment using measuring tools in our center's imaging archive system. Data were analyzed using binary logistic or linear regression, as appropriate, controlling for sex, age, and Charlson Comorbidity Index. Outcome measurements included radiographic healing, range of motion, postoperative complications, and reoperation. The cohort had a mean follow-up of 16.7 months. Mean coronoid fragment area was 362.4±155.9 mm2. Elbow range of motion decreased by 3.8° of elbow flexion (P<.001), 3.3° of elbow extension (P<.001), and 3.8° of forearm supination (P=.007) for every 1-cm2 increase in coronoid fragment area. Complications (P=.012) and reoperation (P=.036) were associated with increasing coronoid fragment area. Nonunion rate, nerve injury, and pronation range of motion were not correlated to increasing coronoid fracture fragment area (P=.777, P=.123, and P=.351, respectively). As displaced coronoid fragment size increases in Monteggia fracture patterns, elbow range of motion decreases linearly. Coronoid displacement was also associated with increased rates of postoperative complication and need for reoperation. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(1):15-21.].

Application of ultrasound in the management of TRASH (the radiographic appearance seemed harmless) fractures in preschool children: A review.

Elbow fracture is one of the most common fractures in preschool children, and the secondary ossification center appears regularly with age increasing. Transphyseal separation of the distal humerus, medial humeral condyle fracture, lateral humeral condyle fracture, radial head osteochondral separation, and Monteggia fracture (minimal ulnar bow type) are difficult to diagnose based on X-ray films alone because of the unossified secondary ossification center or a suspicious non-alignment of the anatomical cartilage of the elbow joint in preschool children. These 5 fractures above are defined as The Radiographic Appearance Seemed Harmless fractures in preschool children (TRASH-PS). The TRASH-PS fractures must be taken into consideration when there is swelling at the injured site without fracture feature on X-ray. Additionally, relevant misdiagnosis or unsuitable management can lead to elbow dysfunction and deformity. Therefore, this work reviews the application of ultrasound in the management of TRASH-PS fractures.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Manifestations of Annular Ligament Injuries in Children With Monteggia Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is commonly performed in children with elbow injuries to visualize soft tissues such as the annular ligament. Herein, we investigated the MRI manifestations of annular ligament injuries in children with Monteggia fractures following attempted closed reduction. METHODS: The clinical and imaging data of 88 children with acute Monteggia fractures treated at our hospital between 2015 and 2019 were analyzed. Clinically and radiographically, 67 patients achieved radiologic reduction of the radial head at the time of MRI, whereas 21 patients had a failed closed reduction. Annular ligament injury and superior radioulnar joint congruency were analyzed qualitatively, and the maximum superior radioulnar joint gap distance was measured. RESULTS: MRI manifestations of annular ligament injury were primarily characterized as varying degrees of annular ligament displacement, as follows: I degree (10 patients), the annular ligament encircled the radial head without displacement; II degree (5 patients), the annular ligament was partially displaced but visibly encircled the radial head at the level of the radial notch; and III degree (73 patients), the annular ligament was completely displaced. In 15 patients with I and II degrees annular ligament injuries, the annular ligament encircled the radial head (maximum superior radioulnar joint gap distance, 1.2±0.3 mm), showing good congruency of the superior radioulnar joint. In 73 patients with III degree annular ligament injury, the annular ligament was displaced and did not encircle the radial head (maximum superior radioulnar joint gap distance, 3.3±2.7 mm; P <0.05), showing good congruency of the superior radioulnar joint in 25 of 73 patients, and significantly poor congruency in 48 of 73 patients ( P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Annular ligament injuries in children with Monteggia fractures exhibit different degrees of displacement of the annular ligament. In I and II degree annular ligament injuries, the annular ligament still encircles the radial head. In III degree annular ligament injuries, the annular ligament is displaced away and is no longer around the radial head. Without the annular ligament restraining the radial head, the superior radioulnar joint is more likely to exhibit poor congruency and increased gap distance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Ultrasound, a new adjuvant method for treating acute Monteggia fracture in children.

PURPOSE: This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of using ultrasound-guided Kirschner wire or elastic intramedullary nail for fixation in the treatment of acute Monteggia fracture in children. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 31 cases of acute Monteggia fracture in children treated with ultrasound-guided Kirschner wire or elastic intramedullary nail fixation between April 2020 and December 2022, including 14 cases of Kirschner wire fixation and 17 cases of elastic intramedullary nail fixation. During the operation, soft tissue compression and nerve and vascular injuries were explored, fracture reduction was performed under ultrasound guidance, and operation time was recorded. After the operation, X-ray examination was conducted to assess the quality of fracture reduction. At the last follow-up, the flexion, extension, pronation, and supination angles of both affected and unaffected elbow joints were measured, and the Mayo score was used to evaluate elbow joint function. RESULTS: The average duration of surgery was 50.16 ± 19.21 min (ranging from 20 to 100 min). Based on the evaluation criteria for assessing reduction quality, 28 cases were deemed excellent, while 3 cases were considered good. After immobilization with long-arm cast for 4-6 weeks postoperatively, elbow and forearm rotation exercises were performed. Kirschner wires were removed after an average of 6.64 ± 0.93 weeks (ranging from 6 to 9 weeks) postoperatively, and elastic intramedullary nails were removed after an average of 5.12 ± 1.54 months (ranging from 4 to 10 months) postoperatively. The average follow-up time was 19.13 ± 11.22 months (ranging from 4 to 36 months). During the final follow-up, the affected limb's range of motion in flexion, extension, pronation, and supination was (141.16 ± 4.24)°, (4.61 ± 2.81)°, (84.52 ± 3.74)°, and (84.23 ± 3.69)°, respectively. There was no notable variance when compared to the healthy limb, which had a range of motion of (141.81 ± 2.99)°, (4.81 ± 2.50)°, (85.61 ± 3.12)°, and (85.03 ± 2.73)° (P > 0.05). The Mayo Elbow Performance index classified 29 cases as excellent and 2 cases as good. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided Kirschner wire or elastic intramedullary nail fixation can be used for the treatment of acute Monteggia fracture in children, which can explore the surrounding nerves, blood vessels, and soft tissue compression, reduce the difficulty of reduction, and cause minimal trauma. It can greatly reduce the risk of radiation exposure and complications such as vascular and nerve injury during the operation.

Monteggia fracture associated with ipsilateral intercondylar distal humeral fracture with posterior interosseous nerve palsy: case report, medico-legal implications, and methodological assessment analysis.

BACKGROUND: The Monteggia fracture, defined as a fracture of the proximal third of the ulnar shaft associated with an anterior or posterior dislocation of the proximal radial epiphysis, is a serious injury accounting for 0.7% of all elbow fractures and dislocations in adults. For adult patients, good results can only be obtained through early diagnosis and adequate surgical treatment. Monteggia fracture-dislocations associated with distal humeral fracture are extremely rare injuries in adults and there are few cases described in the literature. Medico-legal implications arising from such conditions have a host of complexities that cannot be discounted. CASE REPORT: This case report revolves around a patient affected by a type I Monteggia fracture-dislocation, according to the Bado classification, associated with an ipsilateral intercondylar distal humeral fracture. To our knowledge, this combination of lesions has never been reported before in adult patients. A positive result was obtained due to early diagnosis, achievement of anatomical reduction, and optimal stabilization with internal fixation which made it possible to achieve early functional recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Monteggia fracture-dislocations associated with ipsilateral intercondylar distal humeral fracture are extremely rare in adults. In the case herein reported, a favorable outcome was obtained due to early diagnosis, achievement of anatomical reduction and management with internal fixation with plate and screws, as well as early functional training. Misdiagnosis makes such lesions risky in terms of potentially delayed treatment, increasing the need for surgical interventions and the possibility of high-risk complications and disabling sequelae, with possible medico-legal implications. In the case of unrecognized injuries under urgent circumstances, the injuries may become chronic, making the treatment more complex. The ultimate outcomes of a misdiagnosed Monteggia lesion can lead to very serious functional and aesthetic damage.

A coronoid-centric classification system of proximal trans-ulnar fracture-dislocations has almost perfect intraobserver and interobserver agreement.

BACKGROUND: Fracture-dislocations of the elbow, particularly those that involve a fracture through the proximal ulna, are complex and can be difficult to manage. Moreover, current classification systems often cannot discriminate between Monteggia-variant injury patterns and trans-olecranon fracture-dislocations, particularly when the fracture involves the coronoid. The Mayo classification of proximal trans-ulnar fracture-dislocations categorizes these fractures into 3 types according to what the coronoid is still attached to: trans-olecranon fracture-dislocations (the coronoid is still attached to the ulnar metaphysis); Monteggia-variant fracture-dislocations (the coronoid is still attached to the olecranon); and ulnar basal coronoid fracture-dislocations (the coronoid is not attached to either the olecranon or the ulnar metaphysis). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the intraobserver and interobserver agreement of the Mayo classification system when assessing elbow fracture-dislocations involving the proximal ulna based on radiographs and computed tomography scans. METHODS: Three fellowship-trained shoulder and elbow surgeons and 2 fellowship-trained orthopedic trauma surgeons blindly and independently evaluated the radiographs and computed tomography scans of 90 consecutive proximal trans-ulnar fracture-dislocations treated at a level I trauma center. The inclusion criteria included subluxation or dislocation of the elbow and/or radioulnar joint with a complete fracture through the proximal ulna. Each surgeon classified all fractures according to the Mayo classification, which is based on what the coronoid remains attached to (ulnar metaphysis, olecranon, or neither). Intraobserver reliability was determined by scrambling the order of the fractures and having each observer classify all the fractures again after a washout period ≥ 6 weeks. Interobserver reliability was obtained to assess the overall agreement between observers. κ Values were calculated for both intraobserver reliability and interobserver reliability. RESULTS: The average intraobserver agreement was 0.87 (almost perfect agreement; range, 0.76-0.91). Interobserver agreement was 0.80 (substantial agreement; range, 0.70-0.90) for the first reading session and 0.89 (almost perfect agreement; range, 0.85-0.93) for the second reading session. The overall average interobserver agreement was 0.85 (almost perfect agreement; range, 0.79-0.91). CONCLUSION: Classifying proximal trans-ulnar fracture-dislocations based on what the coronoid remains attached to (olecranon, ulnar metaphysis, or neither) was associated with almost perfect intraobserver and interobserver agreement, regardless of trauma vs. shoulder and elbow fellowship training. Further research is needed to determine whether the use of this classification system leads to the application of principles specific to the management of these injuries and translates into better outcomes.

Functional outcomes of pediatric true and equivalent Monteggia fractures - Review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to describe the functional outcome of true and equivalent Monteggia fracture-dislocations in the pediatric population. We also provided a review of the literature about the treatment options. METHODS: Five surgically and three conservatively treated patients were identified who were treated in 2009-2021. The study pop-ulation consisted of six female and two male patients. The mean age at the time of treatment was 7. The mean follow-up time was 55 months (range, 12-128). The Mayo Elbow Performance Score and the Oxford Elbow Score were used for outcome evaluation. Range of motion and grip strengths were also evaluated. RESULTS: There were two Bado type 1 and six Monteggia equivalent injuries. Closed reduction and casting were utilized for the two Bado type 1 injuries as the initial treatment. However, one had a radial head re-dislocation and had to be treated operatively. This patient had a radial head re-dislocation after the surgery and was followed up conservatively. Three Monteggia equivalent injuries were treated with closed reduction and casting, with no complications. One patient had a radial head anterior dislocation with plastic deformation of the ulna, and this patient was managed with CORA-based corrective ulnar osteotomy. For Monteggia injuries, the main treatment objective is to restore the ulnar length. Bilateral computed tomography imaging with 3D reconstruction can be utilized in preoperative planning of Monteggia fracture-dislocations to customize the treatment. Close observation is essential to detect radial head subluxation, which needs early intervention before irreversible changes occur. CONCLUSION: The true/equivalent Monteggia fractures' main treatment goal is to restore the ulnar length. Conservative treatment, with a close follow-up, is the first option if closed reduction can be achieved. If closed reduction is not possible, careful preop-erative planning and early rehabilitation are key to success for management of Monteggia fractures.

[Clinical results of total elbow arthroplasty after treatment failure for Monteggia-like injuries]. / Klinische Ergebnisse der Ellenbogentotalendoprothetik nach Therapieversagen bei Monteggia-like-Verletzungen.

BACKGROUND: Monteggia-like fractures (MLF) are complex injuries with high complication rates and frequently unsatisfying clinical results. Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) represents the only option to salvage the functional requirements in some patients with pronounced posttraumatic arthropathy. This case series provides clinical results of TEA following failed treatment of MLF. METHODS: All patients who underwent TEA from 2017 to 2022 for failed treatment of MLF were retrospectively included in this study. Complications and revisions before and after TEA and functional results, measured by the Broberg/Morrey score, were evaluated. RESULTS: In this study 9 patients with a mean age of 68 (±7; 54-79) years were included. The mean follow-up was 12 (±9; 2-27) months. The main reasons leading to posttraumatic arthropathy were chronic infections (44.4%), bony instability due to coronoid deficiency (33.3%) or a combined coronoid and radial head deficiency (22.2%) and non-union of the proximal ulna with radial head necrosis (11.1%). The mean number of surgical revisions between primary fixation and TEA was 2.7 (±1.8; 0-6). The revision rate following TEA was 44%. The mean Broberg/Morrey score at the time of the latest follow-up was 83 (±10; 71-97) points. CONCLUSION: Chronic infection and coronoid deficiency are the main reasons for posttraumatic arthropathy after MLF leading to TEA. While the overall clinical results are satisfying, the indications should be reserved for selected cases due to high revision rates.

Exposed Intramedullary Fixation Produces Similar Outcomes to Buried Fixation for Acute Pediatric Monteggia Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of acute pediatric Monteggia fractures requires ulnar length stability to maintain reduction of the radiocapitellar joint. When operative care is indicated, intramedullary ulna fixation can be buried or left temporarily exposed through the skin while under a cast. The authors hypothesized that treatment with exposed fixation yields equivalent results to buried fixation for Monteggia fractures while avoiding secondary surgery for hardware removal. METHODS: A retrospective review of children with acute Monteggia fractures at our Level 1 pediatric trauma center was performed. Patient charts and radiographs were evaluated for age, fracture type, fracture location, Bado classification, type of treatment, complications, cast duration, time to fracture union, time to hardware removal, and range of motion. RESULTS: Out of 59 acute Monteggia fractures surgically treated (average age 6 y, range 2 to 14), 15 (25%) patients were fixed with buried intramedullary fixation and 44 (75%) with exposed intramedullary fixation under a cast. There were no significant differences between buried and exposed intramedullary fixation in cast time after surgery (39 vs. 37 d; P =0.55), time to fracture union (37 vs. 35 d; P =0.67), pronation/supination (137 vs. 134 degrees; P =0.68) or flexion/extension (115 vs. 114 degrees; P =0.81) range of motion. The exposed fixation had a return to OR of 4.5% (2 out of 44), and the buried fixation returned to the OR for removal on all patients. CONCLUSION: Exposed intramedullary fixation yielded equivalent clinical outcomes to buried devices in the treatment of acute pediatric Monteggia fractures while eliminating the need for a second surgery to remove hardware, reducing the associated risks and costs of surgery and anesthesia, but had a higher complication rate. Open Monteggia fractures or patterns with a known risk of delayed union may benefit from buried instead of exposed intramedullary fixation for earlier mobilization. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Ulnar osteotomy and monolateral external fixator for the treatment of chronic Monteggia fractures in children: comparison between gradual and acute radial head reduction.

This study evaluated the outcomes of chronic Monteggia fractures (CMFs) treated by ulnar osteotomy and monolateral external fixator (MEF), and compare the outcome of gradual versus acute radial head reduction. Two groups of patients were identified. Group 1: gradual reduction of the radial head ( n = 13); group 2: acute reduction ( n = 6). Clinical outcome was evaluated by Kim Elbow Score, whereas radiographic outcome was assessed on plain radiographs. The effect of age, side, time from initial trauma to surgery, rate of unplanned surgery, amount of angulation and lengthening, and final outcome were evaluated. Univariate analysis was performed to identify factors associated with good radiographic outcome. Thirteen patients underwent gradual correction of the ulna. The mean duration of correction was 43.4 days (range, 21-82); the mean angulation and lengthening of the ulna were 22.8° (range, 0°-35°) and 22.2 mm (range, 12.2-40.9), respectively. Six patients underwent acute reduction intraoperatively, the mean angulation and lengthening of the ulna were 17.2° (range, 4°-33.9°) and 5.2 mm (range, 2.5-12.2), respectively. CMF treated by ulnar osteotomy and gradual distraction had better radiological outcome (Group 1; 92.3% 12/13) than those treated by acute reduction of the radial head (Group 2; 3/6, 50%) ( P = 0.071). Reoperation rate was found to be significantly correlated with a fair or poor radiographic results ( P = 0.016). Good clinical and radiological outcomes should be expected in CMF patients treated by gradual lengthening and angulation of the ulna with a MEF.

[Monteggia lesions and equivalent lesions in children]. / Monteggia-Läsionen und Monteggia-Äquivalent-Läsionen im Kindesalter.

BACKGROUND: Missed Monteggia lesions results in chronic luxation and deficits in the range of motion. The overall therapeutic goal is a quick and stable anatomical repositioning of the lesion. The prognosis of Monteggia lesions in comparison to its equivalents is better, especially with early diagnosis. OBJECTIVE: Comparison of the types of lesion, treatment modalities, hospitalization, immobilization, movement deficits, perioperative complications and outcome. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective study of 62 patients treated with acute Monteggia lesions and its equivalents during the period of 2009-2020. RESULTS: 2 patients were treated with cast immobilization only, 11 with repositioning under general anesthesia, 39 with intramedullary nailing and 10 with screw osteosynthesis. The average observation period was 4.1 months. Patients with cast immobilization needed only a short hospitalization (2 days), patients with repositioning or osteosynthesis had longer hospitalization (3.4 or 4.3 days, respectively). Deficits of the range of motion did not appear in simple cast immobilization or intramedullary nailing without reduction; however, patients with closed reduction or screw osteosynthesis showed some degree of deficits (9% and 40%, respectively). Monteggia lesions needed shorter hospitalization than their equivalents (3.7 vs. 4.5 days) and had less deficits in the range of motion (7% vs. 21%). CONCLUSION: Most patients were treated with osteosynthesis (79%). Patients with Monteggia lesions had a better outcome than patients with equivalent lesions.

Monteggia fractures and Monteggia-like-lesions: a systematic review.

Monteggia injuries are rare, but severe injuries of the elbow including various injury patterns. Treatment of these injuries is still topic of debate and strategies differ widely. In this systematic review on Monteggia injuries in adults, we aimed to clarify the incidence of different injury patterns within Monteggia injuries, investigate the main reasons leading to revision surgery and explore which surgical treatments should be favored to achieve satisfactory clinical results.We initially identified 182 publications and ultimately included 17 retrospective studies comprising 651 cases. All patients were classified using the Bado classification, leading to 30.5% Bado type I fractures, 60.4% type II fractures, 5.1% type III and 3.1% type IV fractures. Mean revision rate was 23%. Ulna non-union (28%) and limited range-of-motion (22%) are the main reasons for revision surgery. Meta-analysis shows a trend toward the use of locking plates for ulna fixation which may lead to less revision surgery and fewer ulna non-unions. Further biomechanical and clinical research is necessary to clarify the role of radial head surgery.

Radial head distalisation with an external ring fixator as a therapy option in children with chronic posttraumatic radiocapitellar dislocations.

PURPOSE: Missed monteggia-type injuries in children can result in chronic radial head dislocation with anatomic changes and osteoarticular remodeling of the radial head. In later stages, joint reconstruction is impossible and a functional radial head distalization can be a therapy option in symptomatic patients. METHODS: From 2010 to 2018, 46 patients (18 female and 28 male, mean age 11.8 (4-20)) with chronic radius head dislocation treated in our institution were retrospectively analyzed. A radial head distalization was performed in symptomatic patients at the time of ulna lengthening and angulation by use of an external ring fixator. We analyzed the surgical and radiographic data as well as the clinical outcome of the patients measured by DASH and Mayo Elbow score. RESULTS: 16 patients (6 female, 10 male) fulfilled the criteria for functional radial head distalization. Main reason was Monteggia injury in 11 cases, and radial head fracture in 5 cases. Average follow-up was 5.1 years (range 1-9, SD 2.1). Mean time from injury was 4.14 years (range: 4 months to 12 years, SD 3.5 years). Mean duration of external fixation was 106 days (range 56-182, SD 31.2), lengthening was 21.3 mm (range 12-42, SD 8.8). Average degree of sagittal angulation 14.8° (0-32°, SD 10.7°), coronal angulation 4.4° (0-25°, SD 7.3°). DASH score showed a good result with 2.4, and the MAYO Elbow Score was excellent (95/100). No secondary luxation of the radius head was detected. CONCLUSION: Radial head distalization with external ring fixator can be a therapy option for chronic radius head dislocations in symptomatic patients without losing stability of the elbow joint in contrast to radial head resection.

Fracture-Dislocations of the Elbow: A Comparison of Monteggia and Terrible Triad Fracture Patterns.

Fracture-dislocations of the elbow are a spectrum of injuries that have varying outcomes and complications, such as limited range of motion and long-term pain. The Monteggia fracture-dislocation and terrible triad fracture-dislocation are 2 such injury patterns that occur secondary to different mechanisms. This study sought to compare complication profiles and patient outcomes associated with these 2 distinct injury patterns. A retrospective chart review of all adult patients treated by 1 of 3 orthopedic traumatologists at a major academic center for operative fixation for either a Monteggia fracture-dislocation or a terrible triad elbow fracture-dislocation over a 12-year period was performed. Data collected included demographics, surgical data, patient-reported pain and elbow stiffness, elbow range of motion, presence of elbow joint contracture, nerve injuries, healing complications, and need for reoperation. The review included 105 patients, 58 with Monteggia injury and 47 with terrible triad injury, who had complete follow-up and radiographic imaging available. At latest follow-up, the 2 groups had similar rates of pain, reoperation, and ultimate elbow range of motion in flexion, extension, pronation, and supination. Elbow contractures requiring operative release were more commonly associated with terrible triad injury, and the incidence of nonunion was significantly greater in Monteggia fractures. A Monteggia fracture-dislocation portends a higher risk of ulna nonunion, whereas terrible triad injury is associated with elbow contracture. Despite their unique complications, both patterns ultimately have high rates of reoperation as their unique complications are both indications for operative repair. Patients should be appropriately counseled on the complication profile of their unique injury pattern. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(3):158-163.].

[Monteggia fractures-dislocations in children: retrospective study of 40 cases in the Department of Orthopedics, Habib Bourguiba University Hospital in Sfax, Tunisia]. / Fractures-luxations de Monteggia chez l'enfant: étude rétrospective de 40 cas dans le Département d'Orthopédie, Centre Hôpital Universitaire Habib Bourguiba de Sfax, Tunisie.

Monteggia's fracture-dislocation is rare in pediatric traumatology and pose a problem of elapsed time before management and of prognosis. The purpose of this study was to describe the epidemiological features of this fracture and to assess functional and anatomical results. We report a series of 40 cases of Monteggia fracture in children whose data were collected and treated at the Habib Bourguiba University Hospital Center in Sfax over a period of 17 years, from January 1998 to January 2015. We listed the epidemiological data of our population as well as the types of fracture dislocations according to the Bado radiological classifications. For functional assessment, the choice of treatment was based on the type of fracture. P. Rigault's score and Kim's score were used. The average age of our study population was 8 years; 20 cases of fractures were classified as Bado I and 12 cases as Bado III. The time elapsed before treatment was less than 24 hours in 82% of cases. Surgical treatment was performed in 28 cases, and functional results were judged to be good in 30 cases. Our results were satisfactory due to the short time elapsed before patient management compared to literature data.

To Angulate or Not to Angulate the Ulna during the Progressive Distraction Period Performed with a Monolateral External Fixator in Paediatric Patients with a Chronic Monteggia Fracture?

Background and Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic evolution of chronic Monteggia fractures (CMFs) treated by ulnar osteotomy and monolateral external fixators (MEFs) with or without angulation of the ulna during the distraction period. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study evaluated 20 children (14 boys and 6 girls) with CMFs. According to the strategy of ulnar lengthening, two groups of patients were identified: patients undergoing gradual lengthening with (Group A, n = 11) or without ulna angulation (Group B, n = 9). The mean age at the time of surgery was 7.7 years old (range, 5.4−12.9). The mean time from initial trauma to surgery was 26.3 months (range, 1−96), and the mean follow-up was 24.6 months (range, 5.5−45.4). Clinical outcomes were evaluated by Kim et al.'s Elbow Performance Score, while radiographic outcomes were assessed on plain radiographs. Results: Age at surgery, sex, laterality, time between trauma and surgery, and time of follow up in the two groups of patients showed no significant differences. The radial head was successfully reduced in 9 of 9 and 10 of 11 patients in Groups B and A, respectively (p = 1.00). The mean time to achieve radial head reduction was shorter in Group B (18.1 ± 5.3 days) than in Group A (39.2 ± 18.7 days; p = 0.004). The mean angulation of the ulna at the end of treatment was significantly lower in Group B (0.6° ± 1.1°) than in Group A (25.9° ± 6.3°; p < 0.0001). The average ulnar lengthening at the end of treatment in Group B (14.1 ± 5.8 mm) was, on average, 7.7 mm less than that in Group A (21.8 ± 9.7 mm; p = 0.05). The Kim et al. Elbow Performance Score at the last follow-up visit was comparable between the two groups of patients (p = 1.00). Conclusions: A shorter time to achieve radial head reduction and less deformity of the ulna can be expected in paediatric patients with CMFs undergoing intraoperative restoration of ulnar alignment and gradual lengthening without angulation postoperatively.

Missed Monteggia fractures in children treated by open reduction of the radial head and corrective osteotomy of the ulna.

Missed Monteggia fractures in children may cause pain, deformity, decreased range of motion, neurological symptoms, and late arthritis of the elbow. Numerous surgical techniques have been advocated to reconstruct missed Monteggia lesions. The purpose of the present study were first to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes after open reduction of the radial head and corrective osteotomy of the ulna, second to identify the factors associated with the preoperative radial notch/head appearance and the postoperative radiographic results. This study investigated the preoperative MRI presentation and the treatment of 29 patients who were diagnosed missed Monteggia fracture. Radiologic and clinical results of these patients were evaluated retrospectively, and the patient's and surgical factors related to preoperative radial notch/head appearance and the postoperative radiographic results were analyzed. Of the 29 patients, the average Kim elbow performance score at the last follow-up was 93.6, with 25 excellent, three good, one fair, and no poor results. 19 children had reduced radial heads, 8 had a subluxated radial head and 2 had dislocated radial heads at the last follow-up. The patient's gender and age had no significant influence on the appearance of radial notch/head and final radiographic results. However, the appearance of radial notch/head can significantly affect the final radiographic result (P < 0.001). The interval time was an important factor which related with the appearance of radial notch/head and final radiographic results (P < 0.001). Treating a missed Monteggia fracture by open reduction of the radial head and corrective osteotomy of the ulna is generally successful and preoperative MRI is meaningful for evaluation of the condition of the radial head and the radial notch which is related with the final radiographic result. The interval time from injury to operation exceeds 6 months, the risk of radial notch/head abnormality and radial head subluxation/re-dislocation after operation significantly increase.

Comparison of the midterm result between locking plate and elastic intramedullary nail treating oblique ulnar fracture Bado type I acute monteggia fracture in pediatric patients.

BACKGROUND: Acute Monteggia fracture (AMF) is defined as a fracture of the proximal ulna combined with a dislocation of the radial head, with less than 1 percent prevalence in pediatric patients with an elbow injury. This retrospective study aimed to compare the efficacy of two treatment methods for oblique ulnar fracture AMF Bado type I in children. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 28 children with oblique ulnar fracture acute Monteggia injury Bado I were included. Patients was divided into two groups: In the EIN group 16 patients were fixed with elastic intramedullary nail after reduction, and in the LCP group 12 patients were fixed with locking compression plate after reduction. Operation time and blood loss were recorded and the patients were assessed clinically by the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), range of movement(ROM) and range of rotation(ROR). RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were accessible for durable follow-up, with a mean age of 7.7 ± 1.3 years, follow up by 33.7 ± 5.1 months. The average operation time was 48.1 ± 9.2 min for the EIN group and 67.1 ± 7.2 min for the LCP group. The average blood loss was 8.2 ± 2.3 ml for the EIN group and 18.8 ± 3.8 ml for the LCP group. The average operation time and average blood loss in the EIN group are significant less than the LCP group. Mean MEPS, ROM, ROR in both group improved significantly before sugery to three months after surgery, and maintained very good results at last follow up. There is no significant difference between the EIN group and the LCP group in MEPS, ROM and ROR. CONCLUSIONS: Oblique ulnar fracture Bado type I acute monteggia fracture in pediatric patients fixed by EIN and LCP can both get good mid-term results measured by MEPS, ROM and ROR, Fixed by EIN have shorter operation time and less blood loss than fixed by LCP.

Novel use of close-wedge osteotomy and monorail external fixator in the treatment of chronic Monteggia fracture.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of close-wedge osteotomy and monorail external fixator in the treatment of chronic Monteggia fracture. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2014 and December 2021, data of a total of 22 patients (14 males, 8 females; mean age: 15.6±5.1 years; range, 6 to 25 years) who suffered from chronic Monteggia fractures were retrospectively reviewed. All the patients were treated for acute angulation of the ulna after osteotomy and gradual angulation for radial head reduction. Range of motion of the elbow and forearm, the angle between the longitudinal axis of proximal radius and the hypothesized Storen's line (RSA), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), as well as Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score were recorded preoperatively and at the final follow-up. RESULTS: Objective parameters were all significantly improved in the aspects of range of motions of the elbow and forearm, and RSA (21.4±4.5° preoperatively and 2.0±1.4° at the final follow-up, t=18.20, p<0.05). The level of pain due to the chronic injury was eliminated, as the mean VAS was significantly lower at the final follow-up compared to preoperative scoring (2.8±2.0 preoperatively and 0.5±0.9 at the final follow-up, t=4.86, p<0.05). The function of the elbow and upper limb was restored, which was indicated by improved MEPS (73.2±12.5 preoperatively and 96.6±6.4 at the final follow-up, t=7.70, p<0.05) and DASH (28.3±6.0 preoperatively and 4.1±2.0 at the final follow-up, t=19.35, p<0.05). No complication was observed. CONCLUSION: Close-wedge osteotomy and gradual lengthening with monorail external fixator in the treatment of chronic Monteggia fracture showed great efficacy. We also provided a specified osteotomy site aiming at PRUJ reconstruction.